All which leaves some scientistswondering who mighthelp them keep an eye on humankind’s effect onthe world.
< figure class = l-article-img l-article-img-- 8col. data-widget-type = imageset. data-widget-layout = 8col > < source media = (min-width: 850px) srcset = https://d267cvn3rvuq91.cloudfront.net/i/images/solarfield_0.jpg?sw=1024amp;cx=18amp;cy=21amp;cw=1320amp;ch=742 1x, https://d267cvn3rvuq91.cloudfront.net/i/images/solarfield_0.jpg?sw=2048amp;cx=18amp;cy=21amp;cw=1320amp;ch=742 2x > < source media =( min-width: 0px) srcset = https://d267cvn3rvuq91.cloudfront.net/i/images/solarfield_0.jpg?sw=401amp;cx=18amp;cy=21amp;cw=1320amp;ch=742 1x, https://d267cvn3rvuq91.cloudfront.net/i/images/solarfield_0.jpg?sw=802amp;cx=18amp;cy=21amp;cw=1320amp;ch=742 2x > At the American Geophysical Union conference in San Francisco on Thursday, Marcia McNutt, president of the National Academy of Sciences, stated that private donors may foot the costspay the bill for funding climate science. According to Buzzfeed, McNutt states that she’s talked to individuals who might raise billions of dollars to assistto assist the cause.The news follows the announcement earlier today of the Development Energy Ventures fund, which devotes $1 billion over the next 20 years to funding energy concepts considered to be too dangerous by routine endeavorequity capital companies. It’s bankrolled by over 20 billionaires, among them Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Alibaba’s Jack Ma, and Virgin’s Richard Branson.The problem, obviously, is that by using to spend for
environment science and energy research, billionaires may simply signal that private financing will be sufficient– a concept that Trump may be pleasedmore than happy to purchase into. That is not the case. The government plays a vital role in funding fundamental research, which should continue.McNutt appears to be believing along the same lines. While she may be trying to line up possible funding
sources, her message to them is, obviously,” hold off. “She states that she doesn’t want anyone to provide Trump and Congress the reason to cut funding for environment science.Fortunately, most billionaires are most likely quite goodproficient at holding their nerve. For the sake of keeping the US government’s financial investment
in theplanet, they may need to. (ReadLearn more: Buzzfeed,” Bill Gates’s$ 1 Billion Fund Will Back Radical Clean Energy Ideas,” “Trump’s Empty Pledge to Coal Nation,”” Trump’s ImpactInfluence on
Clean-Energy Companies “)